Register Now

Evaluation Rubric

All proposals are scored across 10 criteria. Each criterion is worth up to 6 points, for a maximum total of 60 points.

Aligns with Competition Theme

/6 pts
6Proficient

Research question is clearly defined and aligns with the theme. Proposal has a clear focus on Artificial Intelligence and future development.

4Developing

Research question somewhat aligns with the theme but lacks clarity in addressing theme.

2Improvement

Research question is too broad, vague, and unrelated to the theme and/or fails to address theme.

Literature Review

/6 pts
6Proficient

Comprehensive review that demonstrates thorough understanding and well-integrated research.

4Developing

Some content is well-researched and/or somewhat synthesized.

2Improvement

Content is not well-researched and/or poorly synthesized.

Method / Technical

/6 pts
6Proficient

Well-designed experiment with a clear, logical methodology that directly corresponds to the topic.

4Developing

Some intermediate steps are missing, or the method partially aligns with the topic.

2Improvement

Key steps are missing, the method is unclear, or it does not align with the topic.

Organization & Language

/6 pts
6Proficient

Proposal is well-structured, clear, and easy to understand.

4Developing

Minor grammatical and/or structural issues, making the work somewhat hard to follow.

2Improvement

Major grammatical and/or structural issues, making the work difficult to follow.

Originality

/6 pts
6Proficient

Novel idea and/or unique solution.

4Developing

-

2Improvement

Common topic with minimal innovation or unique perspective.

Feasibility

/6 pts
6Proficient

Research is realistic and practical. Methodology is achievable within specified timeframes.

4Developing

Research is somewhat realistic but faces minor implementation hurdles.

2Improvement

Research is unrealistic or impractical for the given scope.

Significance & Relevance

/6 pts
6Proficient

Research addresses an important issue with potential for significant societal or medical impact.

4Developing

Research is somewhat relevant but lacks clear potential for widespread impact.

2Improvement

Research lacks significance and addresses trivial or unimportant issues.

Citation (APA citation only)

/6 pts
6Proficient

At least 7 sources, proper citations, and all sources are credible.

4Developing

At least 6 sources, some credible or proper citations.

2Improvement

At least 4 sources, improper or non-credible citations.

Page Limit

/6 pts
6Proficient

No more than 9 pages without introduction and citation pages.

4Developing

Exceed 9 pages by 2 pages (11 pages) without introduction and citation pages.

2Improvement

Exceed 9 pages by 4 pages (13 pages) without introduction and citation pages.

Format

/6 pts
6Proficient

Times New Roman 12, 1.5 space, 1 inch margin on all sides (automatic format).

4Developing

Some formatting matches.

2Improvement

No format matches.

Maximum Possible Score

60 Points
6Proficient
4Developing
2Improvement

Coming Soon

The evaluation criteria for the Semifinal Round will be announced shortly.

Coming Soon

The evaluation criteria for the Final Round will be announced after the Semifinal Round.

Note:
  • Scores from all judges are averaged to produce the final result. If you have any questions regarding the evaluation process, please feel free to reach out.
  • The judge's decision is final and conclusive, with no appeals or reconsiderations.
  • Points can be given in between columns of the table (such as 1.5, 3, or 5.5).
  • Plagiarism or use of AI will be immediately disqualified.
khunmhor.med@gmail.com @khunmhor.med